Last Updated: September, 2015
Course Level: undergraduate
This assignment asks students to think about how we acquire, assess, and convey knowledge about solitary confinement.
The assignment explicitly asks students to reflect on the choices that two authors (one with first-hand experience of solitary, one without) make in their writing on solitary confinement. This leads implicitly and organically to a class conversation about the social, political, and epistemic position of each writer, and how different positions correspond to different forms of authority. Courses that do not focus on writing skills might play down some of those aspects, while playing up the broader interrogation of criminalization as a social, political, and epistemic process.
The required texts are: 1. A first-hand account of solitary confinement by a current or former prisoner. I used a Guardian blog post, “Solitary Confinement’s Invisible Scars,” Five Omar Mualimm-ak. 2. An academic account of solitary confinement by someone who has not experienced it directly. For this philosophy-focused class, I used selections from Solitary Confinement: Social Death and Its Afterlives by Lisa Guenther.
Matt Whitt Duke University Discipline(s): Composition, Philosophy, Political Science Syllabus Last Updated: September, 2015 A profound tension runs through the public culture of the United States. On the one hand, the U.S. declares itself to be a “land of liberty,” in which individual freedom is cherished and protected. On the other hand, the U.S. has… Read More »Liberty, Justice, and Imprisonment in the United States